An Empirical Study on Current Models for Reasoning about Digital Evidence
نویسندگان
چکیده
The forensic process relies on the scientific method to scrutinize recovered evidence that either supports or negates an investigative hypothesis. Currently, analysis of digital evidence remains highly subjective to the forensic practitioner. Digital forensics is in need of a deterministic approach to obtain the most judicious conclusions from evidence. The objective of this paper is to examine current methods of digital evidence analysis. It describes the mechanisms for which these processes may be carried out, and discusses the key obstacles presented by each. Lastly, it concludes with suggestions for further improvement of the digital forensic process as a whole.
منابع مشابه
Towards a Sustainable Anti-Corruption Strategy: An Ethic-Induced Model
Literature abounds to show that the current anti-corruption strategies have failed to fight corruption because of neglect of ethics in these strategies, despite its importance. The purpose of this paper is to make a contribution to anti-corruption theory by developing a model that clarifies many complex ethical dilemmas around corruption. To develop a conceptual model, the extant literatures on...
متن کاملInteraction of reasoning ability and training intervention in reaction to training evaluation and post training effectiveness.
It has been shown that learners' abilities interact with the type of training intervention and effect on training and its outcomes. For this reason, the current research investigated the interaction of reasoning ability with two training methods, namely deductive and empirical methods, in effect on reaction to training evaluation and post training effectiveness. This research was an applied an...
متن کاملInteraction of reasoning ability and training intervention in reaction to training evaluation and post training effectiveness.
It has been shown that learners' abilities interact with the type of training intervention and effect on training and its outcomes. For this reason, the current research investigated the interaction of reasoning ability with two training methods, namely deductive and empirical methods, in effect on reaction to training evaluation and post training effectiveness. This research was an applied an...
متن کاملThe Effect of Bayesian Reasoning Training on the Results of Clinical Reasoning Tests of Interns
Introduction: Clinical reasoning includes a range of thinking about clinical medicine at all stages of patient evaluation. Bayesian theory can be used to refute or confirm differential diagnoses in the clinical reasoning process. In this way, by learning the basic mathematical language of probability in medicine, we can change our beliefs according to new evidence. The aim of this study is to i...
متن کاملThe Outcomes of Ethics Education to Medical Students Based on Moral Reasoning Models
Introduction: For years, the importance of medical ethics education in medical schools has been emphasized but there is no consensus over learning goals yet. This study aimed to investigate the learning outcomes of medical ethics education based on models of moral reasoning. Methods: This study is a review using proper keywords in databases such as Medline, Web of Science, Scoupus, and Eric li...
متن کامل